The current student-curated exhibit at Rauner Library is one facet of the experiential learning component of the class, which also included a visit to the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., interactive engagement with the African American Museum of Performing Arts in Chicago, and a conversation with Sharon Washington, Tony-nominated playwright, actor, and member of Dartmouth’s Class of 1981. Sponsors of the course included: Rauner Special Collections Library; the Department of Theater, The African and African American Studies Program, the Dartmouth Center for Social Impact; the Division of Institutional Diversity and Equity; the Institute for Black Intellectual and Cultural Life, Dartmouth Libraries, and the Hopkins Center for the Arts.
This exhibit was curated by the members of Associate Professor Monica Ndounou’s “Curating Black Theater” class (THEA 10/AAAS 32) during the Spring 2024 term: Aidan Adams ‘24, Ivie Aiwuyo ‘26, Tamonie Brown ‘24, Julia Cappio ‘27, Makayla Charles ‘27, Godwin Kangor ‘27, Noah Martinez ‘27, Kambrian Winston ‘26, and Justine Zakayo ‘25. It will be on display in Rauner Special Collections Library's Class of 1965 Galleries from July 8th, 2024, through September 28, 2024. Learn more by visiting the exhibit website.Rauner Special Collections Library
Friday, July 26, 2024
Rauner Exhibit: "Creating and Preserving Culture: The Evolution of African American Theater"
Friday, July 12, 2024
Rambling Boys and Ballads Migrant
Joseph Goffe was a New England minister and member of Dartmouth's Class of 1791. We have a few manuscripts connected with him -- primarily letters and sermons. We also have his 1783-85 notebook where young Goffe did some accounting for the labor and costs of building a new sawmill in Bedford, N.H. At the back of this notebook Goffe transcribed a few songs, one of which is "Rambling Boys." The manuscript is discussed by the Vermont-based ballad collectors Helen Hartness Flanders and Marguerite Olney in their 1953 book Ballads Migrant in New England, as well as in modern folk song indexes. As far as we can determine, Goffe's notebook represents the oldest surviving version of the song.
The intentional collection and recording of folklore gained momentum in the 19th century, influenced in part by nationalism and concerns that the lore of rural people, passed along by oral tradition rather than in writing, would be corrupted or lost in a rapidly changing world. While this premise was flawed and led to a lot of questionable academic practices, it also led to a mass recording of beliefs, crafts, music, and other ways that people engaged with their world. Goffe recording "Rambling Boys" at the back of his sawmill ledger established a small fixed point -- how one version of this song went at this specific time, and that a teenage boy liked it well enough to write down the words.
To see the manuscript, ask for Mss 783626. To see Ballads Migrant, ask for Alumni Alcove F9296bal.
Wednesday, July 3, 2024
John Locke Corrected
The really cool thing about the copy with the correct "S" orientations is that all of the errata have been carefully corrected in manuscript. Each mistake as identified on the errata sheet has been crossed out with a corresponding manuscript correction in the proper place in the book. Because these same corrections, in the same hand, appear in other copies in other libraries, we are pretty sure they were done by the original publisher. For the upside down S copy, there is one correction we believe to be in Locke's hand.
Now here is the weird thing--we didn't know we had the copy with all of the corrections. It showed up during a big shelf reading project we are doing. Somehow a lot of our "copy 2" books vanished from the catalog and we are (re)discovering treasures in our collections.
To see the corrected issue, ask for Val 121 L793eb copy 2. The upside down "S" issue is Val121 L793eba.
Friday, June 28, 2024
No Such "Thing" as a "Game"
![Western Union telegram from Williamson to Chamberlain](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgefGQNhTarNrxnviEmHj4NgYvTELbi3fvp_TZroLgoCDAu4kSPiemYPXuMUPD3XXP8YpbfnGJIDd6108_XB37rJBZqbWsjB_7LcMyAX4KsCDLBNB7gH_eAwdonoHgXvcOFMmQLmTndAIc2nRnTQoPOAYbmcRWitpCc4fLwgk4g4-YZQFBGRKb3nlTGUw/w200-h143/telegram001.jpg)
Psychology professors Albert Hastorf and Hadley Cantril, of Dartmouth and Princeton respectively, decided to test that very question. In what would become a classic study in social psychology, they showed a group of Dartmouth students and a separate group of Princeton students the same film of the game. Students were asked simply to note any infractions they observed. On average, Dartmouth students attributed approximately four infractions to each team. Princeton students agreed that their own team had committed about four infractions, but they saw Dartmouth make nearly ten. The study even mentions a Dartmouth alumnus who viewed a copy of the film and insisted parts must have been cut out, as he literally "couldn’t see the infractions he had heard publicized." From this, Hastorf and Cantril concluded that "there is no such 'thing' as a 'game' existing 'out there' in its own right which people merely 'observe.'" In other words, no, not everyone had seen the same game.
This was all very nice for Hastorf, Cantril, and the future of psychology, but not everyone enjoyed the aftermath of the game so much. Poor President Dickey, who was busy trying to recover from strep throat, received a deluge of angry, disappointed, supportive, and occasionally bewildered letters from alumni of Dartmouth and Princeton alike. Hiding in one of the two folders full of such letters, we have a familiar telegram from Norris E. Williamson '26:
Preview of Princeton movies indicates considerable cutting of important part please wire explanation and possible air mail missing part before showing scheduled for January 25 we have splicing equipment.
This is the very telegram Hastorf and Cantril quote in their study as "one of the most interesting examples" of the phenomenon they were studying! Williamson was planning to show the film to his fellow Denver alumni, at least one of whom was so distraught over the news of the game that he could not sleep at night. Executive Officer Edward Chamberlain was eager to oblige his friend "Norrie." At the bottom of the telegram is a scribbled reply to Williamson, which Chamberlain would later convey over the phone:
Print whole when sent from here to you via a Printing group—what parts do you think were cut. Can’t understand it. Eddie.
It appears Chamberlain was able to assure Williamson that
the tape he had been sent was intact. Later, Williamson would write back to
inform Chamberlain that "a good many experts" had viewed the film, and "they
all agreed that it was a good game and not as reported in the papers." But whose perspective can we really trust?
To read more impassioned letters about this historic football game, visit Rauner Library and ask for DP-12, box 7114.
Friday, June 21, 2024
More than a Monster: Medusa as a Mutation
![An illustration of a snake with a woman's head, and accompanying text.](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjeIiQR_3O-vNLZA4JRGzrxxE8BXuuPV0Cf-wWBMZ9mZ1OWhpP9rzJ6i9608bIvPVVdWVNzkdJzOXyfsbhXI0f2KRgKPgacuSKKkhwRi7lF7pMbm6ZgftrhxnmuyRGXkD4S5GlDth8BeRtj6OVACGRUzh86DNJ-r612mAxkjA6xQ-DQuM7-4ZMewklYwQ/w320-h212/IMG_4706.jpg)
In a way, Medusa in this monstrous metaphor makes sense in that the snakes in her hair are similar to the “fibrous mass” of the cancer: the line “snake hair multiplying” references the growing cancer cells. Belloff also calls Medusa an “insidious mutation,” which mirrors the cancerous cells’ mutative behavior.
In addition, the author adopts Medusa’s paralyzing nature–a central aspect to Medusa’s myth–in this metaphor. In the beginning of the book, the author’s mother, the cancer victim, is also the Gorgon’s or Medusa’s victim. However, Belloff indicates a turn towards the middle of the book: “Yet it is I who becomes immobile / paralyzed by the mythic gaze / helpless to save her from this fate.” Both the cancer patient and her loved ones become victims to the Gorgon’s “paralyzing gaze,” speaking to the fact that all suffer in different ways when someone we love falls ill to such a frightening disease. Cancer seizes many as its victims.
On one hand, in these ways Medusa as the “mythical tormentor” in this story makes sense, but the author does not seem to root the metaphor much in myth beyond the serpentine imagery and the paralyzing nature of both Medusa and cancer. The author frequently refers to the cancer as “the Gorgon’s eye” in the singular yet the illustrator depicts the cancer with multiple eyes, morphing eyes and multiplying cancer cells as one. The artist even portrays Medusa with multiple eyes–a creature more reminiscent of the giant Argos (given the nickname “all-seeing” for his thousands of eyes) or even a mutated cyclops of some sort. So you may still be wondering: why does Belloff ultimately chose Medusa over thousands of mythological monsters?
Maybe it’s the familiarity of Medusa’s myth, or the fact that she started out human and becomes a mutated female, similar to how cancer slowly takes away one’s life. Maybe the author picked a female monster for a cancer that predominately impacts women. Regardless, this author certainly decided to embrace Medusa’s monstrous side in a powerful metaphor and story about her mother’s cancer.
Come into Rauner to view the Medusa exhibit on display in the Mezzanine until June 28th. To request Belloff’s book, ask for Presses I68bec
Friday, June 14, 2024
Cornelia Meigs: A Wildly Successful Experiment
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjyw9DawaJvuQA2r9uFknNA5bWwth0G1AtZnNIhBTk67KfuNWtp8qaydEM17UYgzTYJlp40hPtLLJC64b182R41Ffbihc5y-H3eVR5L5DJe5fQN3SfeazmwJlb9PiMbjBsLIalAsrC-hErZkF49C_ERrbggScejmapyBv4a8WhjHMwenxC8qbh2UOR51A/w153-h200/Meigs%20Blog-1.jpg)
With the increased need for manpower and military men in WWII, women were encouraged to take their place in the production line and step outside the bounds of traditional domestic work. Countless women stepped up and worked behind the scenes (and on the battlefield), helping the U.S. bring back a victory, too. And they did this work not just in factories; women flew planes and became cryptographers like Meigs.
![Top portion of Meig's application for Information Specialist with the male gender box checked](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQYdmXCvjEf176UozTAQQAH6Ky3nCCQo-xInCyZ5LbQUgPsQpnljpaVVTGZZULv0Vp6XVMjHqpbTNRJsHW2uoZ1IFeL77dYqoKvMvjPnFfIlU6t9qekA2ipc_fHcQMuTdSfaCvZZHjDz3ChAufGjkhoVuKSb_vRPLihUxw-icZpydIpFtizequClBPUg/w200-h133/Meigs-Blog-2.jpg)
One particular document from her training, “The Introduction to the Cryptography course in the Navy for Students,” provides insight into cultural attitudes towards women taking over male tasks, such as cryptography. The second paragraph calls Meigs’s cryptography class “experimental” and ends with the statement that “cryptanalytic work has usually been done by men in the previous years. Whether women can take it over successfully remains to be proved…”
However, Meigs proved that women can, indeed, succeed as a cryptographer: she completed the class and became a talented crypto-analyst during the war. We have many of her exams, all with high marks; as shown by this featured test, Meigs frequently earned a perfect score.
Friday, June 7, 2024
Singing the Song of Himself
So many typefaces! So much hype! So expansive! So Walt Whitman!
Stop by and take a look by asking for Broadside 001475. And there is plenty more if you are into Whitman!